Tax is often treated as a year-end obligation — but its impact goes far beyond compliance.
This section explores key tax concepts, real-world scenarios, and strategic thinking to help business owners understand how tax decisions affect their business outcomes.
DIGITAL BUSINESS & TAX: WHY THE CURRENT TAX SYSTEM IS NO LONGER FIT FOR PURPOSE
In today’s economy, businesses no longer need a physical presence to operate globally.
A company can:
sell products across borders
serve international customers
generate revenue in multiple jurisdictions
—all without setting foot in those countries.
This transformation has created a fundamental challenge:
How should digital businesses be taxed?
Continued..
The Core Problem: Old Tax Rules vs New Economy
The traditional tax system is built on two key principles:
Tax residency (where the company is located)
Source of income (where the income is generated)
However, digital business models do not fit neatly into these concepts.
For example:
A company is incorporated in Country A
Its servers are located in Country B
Its customers are in Country C
So, which country has the right to tax the income?
Issue #1: Allocation of Taxing Rights
One of the biggest challenges is determining which country gets to tax the profits.
In the digital economy:
Value is often created in market jurisdictions (where users are)
But profits are reported in low-tax jurisdictions
This creates:
disputes between countries
unfair tax outcomes
revenue loss for many governments
Issue #2: BEPS and Profit Shifting
Multinational companies often engage in Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) strategies.
Common practices include:
locating intellectual property in tax havens
shifting profits to low-tax jurisdictions
As a result:
profits are not taxed where economic activity actually occurs
developing countries are disproportionately affected
Issue #3: The “Nexus” Problem
Traditionally, a company must have a physical presence in a country to be taxed there.
But in the digital economy:
businesses can generate significant revenue
without any physical presence
This challenges the concept of nexus—the connection required for taxation.
There is now a clear need to redefine nexus based on:
user participation
digital presence
economic activity
Global Response: The OECD Two-Pillar Solution
To address these challenges, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development introduced a global framework:
Pillar One: Reallocation of Profits
Allows countries to tax a portion of profits
even without physical presence
focuses on market jurisdictions
👉 Objective: Improve fairness in profit allocation
Pillar Two: Global Minimum Tax
Introduces a minimum corporate tax rate (around 15%)
reduces incentives for profit shifting
👉 Objective: Limit tax avoidance
The Rise of Unilateral Digital Taxes (DST)
While waiting for global consensus, many countries have introduced Digital Services Taxes (DST).
However, this has led to:
inconsistent tax rules
double taxation risks
increased international disputes
This highlights the limitation of unilateral actions in solving a global issue.
Implementation Challenges
Despite strong policy proposals, implementation remains difficult.
Key challenges include:
differences in national interests
legal and regulatory variations
concerns over tax sovereignty
political and economic priorities
In practice, achieving global agreement is complex and time-consuming.
Why This Matters for Businesses
Although this discussion often focuses on multinational corporations, the impact extends to:
digital entrepreneurs
e-commerce businesses
cross-border service providers
In the future:
tax compliance requirements will become stricter
international tax rules will become more complex
Taxtivo Insight
The digital economy has fundamentally changed how value is created.
However, the tax system is still catching up.
Until there is:
global consensus
consistent implementation
there will continue to be:
tax gaps
planning opportunities
regulatory uncertainty
Conclusion
The current international tax framework is no longer sufficient for the digital economy.
Key challenges include:
allocation of taxing rights
outdated nexus rules
widespread profit shifting
The OECD’s Two-Pillar Solution represents a major step forward.
However, its success depends on one critical factor:
👉 global cooperation
Without it, fragmentation and tax disputes will continue to shape the future of international taxation.
References
Ponomareva, K. (2022). Tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2021). Two-Pillar Solution
TAX AVOIDANCE VS TAX EVASION: WHAT REALLY DRIVES NON-COMPLIANCE?
When people hear the word “tax,” reactions are often mixed.
Some comply fully.
Some try to minimise.
Others avoid it altogether.
But the real question is:
👉 Why do taxpayers choose not to comply?
Understanding this is critical—not just for governments, but also for businesses and advisors.
Continued..
First, Let’s Be Clear: Avoidance vs Evasion
There is a fundamental difference:
Tax Avoidance
Legal strategies used to reduce tax liability
Tax Evasion
Illegal actions such as underreporting income or hiding transactions
Both reduce government revenue—but the intent and legality are very different.
The Real Issue: It’s Not Just About the Taxpayer
A common misconception is that non-compliance is purely an individual choice.
In reality:
👉 Tax behaviour is heavily influenced by the system itself
Research shows that multiple factors shape whether someone complies—or not.
Key Drivers of Tax Avoidance & Evasion
1. Low Awareness
Many taxpayers simply:
don’t understand tax rules
lack proper guidance
Without awareness, compliance becomes difficult—even unintentionally.
2. Weak Tax System
When the system is:
complex
unclear
poorly structured
👉 taxpayers are more likely to:
make errors
exploit loopholes
3. Lack of Trust in Authorities
A weak relationship between taxpayers and tax authorities leads to:
low confidence
reduced willingness to comply
👉 Trust plays a bigger role than most people realise.
4. High Tax Burden
When taxpayers feel:
overtaxed
pressured by multiple taxes
👉 they are more likely to:
engage in avoidance
justify non-compliance
5. Lack of Incentives
If there is no clear benefit to compliance:
👉 taxpayers may question
“Why should I comply fully?”
The Bigger Impact: Government Revenue
Tax avoidance and evasion don’t just affect individuals.
They create:
a gap between expected and actual tax collection
reduced government revenue
weaker public services
Over time, this directly impacts:
👉 infrastructure
👉 healthcare
👉 national development
Important Insight: Behaviour is System-Driven
One key takeaway:
👉 Non-compliance is not purely a personal failure
It is often driven by:
system weaknesses
lack of education
policy gaps
Human behaviour is complex and influenced by environment—not just intention.
What Governments Need to Do
To improve compliance, governments must focus on:
1. Education & Awareness
start early (students, new workers, entrepreneurs)
simplify tax knowledge
2. Digitalisation of Tax Systems
improve transparency
enable better tracking
reduce opportunities for evasion
3. Incentives for Compliance
reward voluntary compliance
create positive reinforcement
4. Strong Enforcement
penalties must be clear and consistent
act as deterrent for intentional evasion
The Hidden Layer: Shadow Economy
Tax evasion is closely linked to the shadow economy, where:
income is hidden
transactions are not reported
In some cases:
👉 professionals may even assist in structuring such activities
This makes enforcement significantly more challenging.
Why This Matters for Malaysia
Although this study focuses on another country, the insights are highly relevant.
In Malaysia, similar issues exist:
SME compliance challenges
awareness gaps
system complexity
As tax systems evolve (e.g., e-invoicing),
👉 compliance expectations will become stricter.
Taxtivo Insight
If you want to understand tax behaviour, don’t just look at the taxpayer.
👉 Look at the system.
Because:
complex systems create confusion
weak systems create loopholes
unfair systems create resistance
Conclusion
Tax avoidance and tax evasion are not just legal or illegal actions.
They are outcomes of:
awareness levels
system design
trust in authorities
Improving compliance requires more than enforcement.
It requires:
👉 education
👉 system improvement
👉 policy alignment
Only then can a tax system become:
fair
effective
sustainable
References
Mughal, M. M., & Akram, M. (2012). Reasons of tax avoidance and tax evasion